Hillary needs to run away and hide, had we nominated Warner this would have never been in doubt.
He's talking about Warner. But I would think Hilary would have the bid in 2016.
Hillary needs to run away and hide, had we nominated Warner this would have never been in doubt.
[img]http://www.gifsoup.com/view7/2505516/brandon-phillips-dugout-dance-o.gif[/img]
Nominated Warner for Prez this year?
Race wouldn't have been close had we nominated Warner. Warner will be the Ronald Reagan of the Dems if our party will give the man a shot.
[img]http://www.gifsoup.com/view7/2505516/brandon-phillips-dugout-dance-o.gif[/img]
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: PVFAN</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hillary needs to run away and hide, had we nominated Warner this would have never been in doubt. </div></div>
warner for prez? I could bout buy into that.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: PVFAN</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Race wouldn't have been close had we nominated Warner. Warner will be the Ronald Reagan of the Dems if our party will give the man a shot. </div></div>
No I think its a good idea and I completely agree. Just was making sure thats what you meant.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: PVFAN</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Race wouldn't have been close had we nominated Warner. Warner will be the Ronald Reagan of the Dems if our party will give the man a shot. </div></div>
Better watch calling him Ronald Reagan of the Dems. Most Dems think Reagan was the worst pres ever. I of course think the exact opposite
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." -Thomas Jefferson
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: R13</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: PVFAN</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Race wouldn't have been close had we nominated Warner. Warner will be the Ronald Reagan of the Dems if our party will give the man a shot. </div></div>
No I think its a good idea and I completely agree. Just was making sure thats what you meant. </div></div>
Warner is more of the old school dems, which is how I was raised. He's actually one dem I would seriously listen to and consider his ideas.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: boney</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: R13</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: PVFAN</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Race wouldn't have been close had we nominated Warner. Warner will be the Ronald Reagan of the Dems if our party will give the man a shot. </div></div>
No I think its a good idea and I completely agree. Just was making sure thats what you meant. </div></div>
Warner is more of the old school dems, which is how I was raised. He's actually one dem I would seriously listen to and consider his ideas. </div></div>
As would I.
"Yes, there are two paths you can go by
But in the long run
There's still time to change the road you're on."
Which is why it wouldn't be close. I'd consider pulling a R13 and campaigning for Warner.
[img]http://www.gifsoup.com/view7/2505516/brandon-phillips-dugout-dance-o.gif[/img]
Bookmarks